Pricing

Free for your team. Paid if you resell it.

Watching your own compliance footprint costs nothing and will keep costing nothing. Serving one more team is close to free for us, and the open data is how people find this in the first place. Money changes hands only when the record goes into someone else's product.

Commercial re-use

from €500/month

For products that build on the record: GRC platforms, publishers, certification bodies, compliance tooling.

  • White-label use, no attribution requirement
  • Schema stability with advance notice on changes
  • Freshness SLA and a named contact
  • Higher limits, bulk and historical access
  • Warranty terms and a DPA
See the terms

Priced against building it yourself, which is roughly two engineer months plus permanent upkeep.

Many clients

Not built yet

For consultants and agencies tracking several client footprints at once.

  • Saved profiles per client
  • Alerts scoped to each footprint
  • Client-ready exports

We will build this when people ask for it, not before. If that is you, say so and it moves up the list.

Tell us you need it

Questions this raises

Free forever, really? What is the catch?

The catch is honest and small. Serving one more team costs us almost nothing: no model runs when you query, only a bounded database read. What does cost money is watching the sources and enriching what comes in, and that expense is the same whether ten or a thousand teams read the result. So the free tier is not charity, it is arithmetic. What we ask in return is that you do not repackage the record into a product you sell without talking to us.

Where exactly is the line between free and paid?

Watching your own systems is free, without limit in time. Putting our data into something you ship to your own customers is commercial re-use. The open dataset is published under CC BY 4.0, so attribution-bearing use is already permitted by that licence. A commercial licence adds what CC BY does not give you: white-label use without attribution, a stable schema with notice before it changes, a freshness commitment, warranty terms and someone to call.

Why not a €29 subscription like others have?

Because it would be the wrong trade for both sides. A cheap subscription needs volume to matter, volume needs support, and support is the one thing we cannot scale right now without doing it badly. We would rather have a handful of licence customers with contracts and a direct line than hundreds of small ones with a ticket queue. If that changes because real demand shows up, we will say so publicly.

What happens to free access when you start charging?

Nothing. The team tier is not a promotion that expires. If we ever have to change it, existing users keep what they use and hear about it well in advance. The public feed, the open dataset and the reference pages stay open regardless.

What about VAT?

Nothing is invoiced for the team tier, so the question does not arise there. Licences are invoiced through ligea GmbH with the usual EU B2B reverse-charge treatment.

Is this legal advice?

No. AI Act Radar is informational only, not legal advice. See our full disclaimer.